-
This discussion was created from comments split from: What is the next brew on your list?."On it. I hate software." ~Cpt Snarklepants
-
C_dubbs said:
This will be my second go with this smoked porter, slightly varied from the first.
57% Maris Otter
29% Smoked Malt (Weyermann)
5% Biscuit Malt
5% Chocolate Rye
2% Carafa III
2% Flaked Barley
0.5oz Northern Brewer 9.4% FWH
0.5oz Mt. Hood 5.5% 20 min
WLP004 (becoming my favorite yeast, so I am using it anywhere I can)
this SHOULD come in at:
OG - 1.062
FG - 1.017
This will be the first time using the Weyermann smoked malt. Depending on the results I may consider throwing in a few oz of Cherrywood Smoked Malt, but I will have to wait and see how this batch tastes.
Amigo, lay them raises down. -
@Evan_B I split this off so I can search for it in the recipe later :D
Oh, and so other people can find it too or whatever.
Pop up some more in the recipe section if you want!"On it. I hate software." ~Cpt Snarklepants -
I haven't settled on a name for this one, but I was leaning towards Count Furfur.
Count Furfur is supposedly a Great Earl of Hell, who knew they had a Peerage in Hell?
Amigo, lay them raises down. -
Evan_B said:
I haven't settled on a name for this one, but I was leaning towards Count Furfur.
Count Furfur is supposedly a Great Earl of Hell, who knew they had a Peerage in Hell?
Ha!The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny -
Evan_B said:
I haven't settled on a name for this one, but I was leaning towards Count Furfur.
Count Furfur is supposedly a Great Earl of Hell, who knew they had a Peerage in Hell?
Peerage!
I think I like this guy!Jesus didn't wear pants -
personally I'd think this is a bit heavy handed with the Smoked Malt. I confirmed my suspicions with a little reading in Designing Great Beers (one of my bibles) and most smoked beers are around 20% smoked grist, and at that it would be a rauch malt (which you are using), and not peated. peat smoked malts have a very intense smokiness, i played with it with poor results early in my recipe formulation days.The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny
-
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.Amigo, lay them raises down. -
Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny -
Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.Amigo, lay them raises down. -
Evan_B said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.
also a Rauchmalt i assume? I've never done a comparison, but i'm going to go out on a limb and say the rauchmalts are going to be comparable, although it's hard to know what wood they actually smoked with, but it's probably beechwood or a fruit wood.The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny -
I just finished up the batch a little while ago, and ended up cutting the smoked malt in half, and increased my base malt by 1.0lb. I plan on honing this recipe, so this is just a step in the process overall, but I will be sure to let you know what the smoke is like.Amigo, lay them raises down.
-
Evan_B said:
I just finished up the batch a little while ago, and ended up cutting the smoked malt in half, and increased my base malt by 1.0lb. I plan on honing this recipe, so this is just a step in the process overall, but I will be sure to let you know what the smoke is like.
sweet!
i love the smell of a boiling smokey wort.The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny -
Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
I just finished up the batch a little while ago, and ended up cutting the smoked malt in half, and increased my base malt by 1.0lb. I plan on honing this recipe, so this is just a step in the process overall, but I will be sure to let you know what the smoke is like.
sweet!
i love the smell of a boiling smokey wort.
That makes dos of us!
Amigo, lay them raises down. -
Lakewood said:Evan_B said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.
also a Rauchmalt i assume? I've never done a comparison, but i'm going to go out on a limb and say the rauchmalts are going to be comparable, although it's hard to know what wood they actually smoked with, but it's probably beechwood or a fruit wood.
briess smoked malt is done with cherry wood:
http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PISB_SmokedMalt.pdf
the weyerman is smoked with beech:
http://www.weyermann.de/eng/produkte.asp?idkat=232&umenue=yes&idmenue=0&sprache=2
apparently they have an oak smoked wheat malt. that sounds like fun.The pinnacle of lame and awesome in one singular moment. -Lake -
FromZwolle said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.
also a Rauchmalt i assume? I've never done a comparison, but i'm going to go out on a limb and say the rauchmalts are going to be comparable, although it's hard to know what wood they actually smoked with, but it's probably beechwood or a fruit wood.
briess smoked malt is done with cherry wood:
http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PISB_SmokedMalt.pdf
the weyerman is smoked with beech:
http://www.weyermann.de/eng/produkte.asp?idkat=232&umenue=yes&idmenue=0&sprache=2
apparently they have an oak smoked wheat malt. that sounds like fun.
Thanks! I was obviously being lazy. It would be interesting to do a direct comparision of the two to see what the difference between beechwood and cherry smoked malt is.The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny -
Lakewood said:FromZwolle said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.
also a Rauchmalt i assume? I've never done a comparison, but i'm going to go out on a limb and say the rauchmalts are going to be comparable, although it's hard to know what wood they actually smoked with, but it's probably beechwood or a fruit wood.
briess smoked malt is done with cherry wood:
http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PISB_SmokedMalt.pdf
the weyerman is smoked with beech:
http://www.weyermann.de/eng/produkte.asp?idkat=232&umenue=yes&idmenue=0&sprache=2
apparently they have an oak smoked wheat malt. that sounds like fun.
Thanks! I was obviously being lazy. It would be interesting to do a direct comparision of the two to see what the difference between beechwood and cherry smoked malt is.
I immediately regret not keeping a bottle from the first batch to compare. Though I am going to start experimenting more with the different smoked malts.
The Briess cherrywood smoked malt is like bacon. I often think of just carrying a small bag around with me to have the smell of bacon whenever I "need" it.Amigo, lay them raises down. -
Evan_B said:Lakewood said:FromZwolle said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:Lakewood said:Evan_B said:
This will be my second version of this (Mk.II). In the first I used 30% smoked malt for a 2 gal batch, and I was happy with the results. I do like my smoked beers. I was a little bummed with Stone Smoked Porter, as they were a little light on the smokiness for my taste.
With that being said, Mk.1 did not use Weyermann, and my LHBS recently decided to switch the smoked malt. This next batch I am stepping up to 4 gal. I had originally planned to use more smoked malt, but ultimately scaled it back not having used Weyermann before.
I am still a little up in the air. I make err on the side of caution and decrease the smoked malt to see what I am really dealing with here.
do you know what you used last time?
I believe it was Briess.
also a Rauchmalt i assume? I've never done a comparison, but i'm going to go out on a limb and say the rauchmalts are going to be comparable, although it's hard to know what wood they actually smoked with, but it's probably beechwood or a fruit wood.
briess smoked malt is done with cherry wood:
http://www.brewingwithbriess.com/Assets/PDFs/Briess_PISB_SmokedMalt.pdf
the weyerman is smoked with beech:
http://www.weyermann.de/eng/produkte.asp?idkat=232&umenue=yes&idmenue=0&sprache=2
apparently they have an oak smoked wheat malt. that sounds like fun.
Thanks! I was obviously being lazy. It would be interesting to do a direct comparision of the two to see what the difference between beechwood and cherry smoked malt is.
I immediately regret not keeping a bottle from the first batch to compare. Though I am going to start experimenting more with the different smoked malts.
The Briess cherrywood smoked malt is like bacon. I often think of just carrying a small bag around with me to have the smell of bacon whenever I "need" it.
That begs the question of when someone does NOT need the smell of bacon.The only thing between me and a train wreck is blind luck..... - Kenny
Evan_B's Smoked Porter